|
勇者無懼，面對 APU處理器毫不畏懼！
採用Intel® 處理器，打造最佳性價比系統平台！(筆記型處理器篇)
Intel confidential. Do not distribute.
在上一周的通路產品通路快報中，已針對Intel® 桌上型處理器及競爭對手的桌上處理器型進行比較測試。從測試結果也顯現了Intel® Pentium® 處理器系列及第2代Intel® Core™ 處理器在生產力、日常應用、多媒體應用上的表現都比競爭對手的APU桌上型處理器來得優秀。在本期的通路產品快報中，將延續上週的主題，但本期要比較測試產品是筆記型處理器。競爭對手除了在DIY市場推出APU桌上型處理器，在筆記型電腦市場也有APU筆記型處理器的存在。本期通路產品通路快報將為通路夥伴們報導Intel筆記型處理器與競爭對手的APU筆記型處理器的效能差異，讓通路夥伴們可以更了解兩者的差距。
以下為Intel® 筆記型處理器系列的規格功能對照表，供通路夥伴參考。
處理器品質、構造、技術決定處理器效能強弱
首先，先來看看入門級筆記型處理器的比較測試。測試結果顯示，在生產力、日常應用、影片編輯、相片編修、音樂編輯的應用上，Intel® 入門級筆記型處理器的表現都比競爭對手的入門級筆記型處理器來得優秀。即使是只有單核心單執行緒的Intel® Celeron® 925，其效能亦比競爭對手的雙核心筆記型處理器AMD Ontario C-50及AMD Zacate E-350來得優秀。由此可見，核心數不等於效能強弱。處理器的品質、構造、技術才是決定處理器效能強弱的重要關鍵。
Legal Disclaimer:
Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. Go to: http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.
All products, computer systems, dates, and figures specified are preliminary based on current expectations, and are subject to change without notice.
Intel product plans in this presentation do not constitute Intel plan of record product roadmaps. Please contact your Intel representative to obtain Intel’s current plan of record product roadmaps.
Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Core, Core, Core Inside, vPro, Pentium, Insider, and InTru are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries.
* Other name and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Copyright © 2011, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Source: Intel Corporation.
Configuration:
AMD* Ontario C-50 (2C2T, 1.0 GHz, 1MB cache), OEM System, BIOS: v 1.03, ID1510/S B800, Memory: Micron*2GB DDR3-8500, Hard Drive: Hitachi* 320GB 7200rpm SATA2, Graphics: AMD* Radeon HD 6250, Driver: 8.792.0.0, OS: Microsoft* Windows* 7 Ultimate 64-bit
AMD* Zacate E-350 (2C2T, 1.6 GHz, 1MB cache), OEM System, BIOS: v F.03, ID1510/S B800, Memory: Micron*4GB DDR3-8500, Hard Drive: Hitachi* 320GB 7200rpm SATA2, Graphics: AMD* Radeon HD 6250, Driver: 8.792.0.0, OS: Microsoft* Windows* 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Intel® Pentium® Processor P6200 (2C2T, 2.13GHz, 3MB cache), OEM System, BIOS: v F.09, Intel INF: 9.1.1.1025, Memory: Micron*4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1066, Hard Drive: Hitachi* 320GB 7200rpm SATA2, Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics, Driver: 8.15.10.2182, OS: Microsoft* Windows* 7 Ultimate 64-bit
主流筆記型處理器效能比較
接著來進行主流筆記型處理器的效能比較。根據測試結果，Intel® Pentium® B950在效能上不僅勝過AMD A6-3400M，也勝過AMD A8-3500M。而更高階的Intel® Core™ i3-2330M以及 Intel® Core™ i5-2430M，其效能當然更在競爭對手的APU筆記型處理器之上。在多媒體應用上，Intel® Core™ i3-2330M及Intel® Core™ i5-2430M因為搭載了Intel® 高速影像同步轉檔技術,因此在影片的編輯、轉檔及分享上都能快速的完成工作，遠遠超越競爭對手。總而言之，具備智慧效能的第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器及其具有的多工處理能力提供了卓越的效能及影像處理能力。
Legal Disclaimer:
Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. Go to: http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.
All products, computer systems, dates, and figures specified are preliminary based on current expectations, and are subject to change without notice.
Intel product plans in this presentation do not constitute Intel plan of record product roadmaps. Please contact your Intel representative to obtain Intel’s current plan of record product roadmaps.
Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Core, Core, Core Inside, vPro, Pentium, Insider, and InTru are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries.
* Other name and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Copyright © 2011, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Source: Intel Corporation.
Configuration:
Intel Configuration:
Mobile - SYSmark* 2007 Preview, PCMark* Vantage and Intel HDXPRT 2011
2nd Generation Intel® CoreTM processors ( e.g. Intel® Core™ i5-2430M Processor (4T/2C, 2.4 GHz base, up to 3.0 GHz, 3M L3); Intel® Core™ i3-2330M Processor (4T/2C, 2.2 GHz, 3M L3); etc. ) and Intel® Pentium B950 Processor (2T/2C, 2.1 GHz, 2M L3) on Platform : HP* 6550b notebook, Mobile Intel Chipset (Intel Chipset 9.2.0.1021) Wireless: On and connected BIOS Default Setup, HP/68SCE Ver F.01 Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics 2000/3000 (Intel Integrated driver 8.15.10.2342), Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3 1333 9-9-9-24 HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2 OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate System Power Management Policy: High Performance for SYSmark 2007 Preview LCD:15.6” LED resolution 1336x768 Screen Brightness: 60-80 nits Battery Capacity: 57 Watt-Hours
AMD* Configurations
Mobile SYSmark* 2007 Preview, PCMark* Vantage, and Intel HDXPRT 2011
AMD* Llano platform processors ( e.g. AMD A8-3500M (4T/4C, 1.6GHz Base, 4x512K L2); AMD A6-3400M (4T/4C, 1.5GHz Base, 4x512K L2), etc.). on Platform : HP dv6-6110us notebook, AMD* 358E (ID1705) Chipset Wireless: On and connected Memory 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel Micron* DDR3 Model MT8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 BIOS Optimal Default Setup, HP F.1C Date. 5/12/2011Graphics: Radeon Integrated Graphics HDD: Travelstar* 320GB 7200rpm HDD, OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate System Power Management Policy: “HP Optimized” (Balanced) LCD Size:15.6” 1336x768 resolution Screen Brightness: 60-80 nits (MobileMark* 2007 scores recorded at lowest sustained brightness setting that is above BAPCO*’s requirements) Battery Capacity: 57 Watt-Hours
筆記型處理器大亂鬥
再來我們加入多款Intel自家其他型號的32奈米製程的筆記型處理器及競爭對手的其他型號處理器，藉此來個處理器大亂鬥。根據 HDXPRT 2011 Create HD Score的測試分數顯示，Intel處理器幾乎佔有全面的優勢，尤其是第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器的表現更是突出。而四核心的Intel® Core™ i7-2720QM的測試結果則近乎競爭對手的頂級APU筆記型處理器AMD A8-3530MX的三倍。由此可見，在媒體創作表現上，第 2 代 Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器明顯強於 AMD* Phenom* 及 Llano* 筆記型處理器。
Legal Disclaimer:
Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. Go to: http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.
All products, computer systems, dates, and figures specified are preliminary based on current expectations, and are subject to change without notice.
Intel product plans in this presentation do not constitute Intel plan of record product roadmaps. Please contact your Intel representative to obtain Intel’s current plan of record product roadmaps.
Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Core, Core, Core Inside, vPro, Pentium, Insider, and InTru are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries.
* Other name and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Copyright © 2011, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Source: Intel Corporation.
Configuration:
Intel® Celeron® B810 (2T/2C, 1.60GHz, 2M L3), Intel® Pentium® B940 (2T/2C, 2.0GHz, 3M L3), Intel® Core™ i3-2310M (4T/2C, 2.1GHz, 3M L3), Intel® Core™ i5-2410M (4T/2C, 2.3GHz Turbo to 2.9GHz, 3M L3), Intel® Core™ i7-2720QM (8T/4C, 2.2GHz Turbo to 3.3GHz, 6M L3, 45W), on Platform: HP* dv6t-6000 notebook, Mobile Intel Chipset (Intel Chipset 9.2.0.1015) Wireless: On and connected BIOS Default Setup, HP/68SCE Ver F.07, Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics 3000 (Intel Integrated driver 8.15.10.2361), Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3-1333, HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2, OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 64-bit, LCD:15.5” LED resolution 1366x768, Battery Capacity: 55 Watt-Hours
AMD* Phenom* II P940 (4C, 1.7GHz, 4x512K L2, 3.6GT/s), AMD* Phenom* II N950 (4C, 2.1GHz, 4x512K L2, 3.6GT/s), on Platform: HP* dv6z-3200 notebook, AMD* M785 (RS880M) Chipset Wireless: On and connected, Memory 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel Micron* DDR3-1333, BIOS Default Setup, HP/68DTM Ver. F.23 Graphics: AMD* Radeon* 4250 (V.8.770.2.2000), HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200rpm HDD, OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 64-bit, LCD:15.5” LED resolution 1366x768, Battery Capacity: 53 Watt-Hours
AMD* Llano* A8-3530MX (4T4C, 1.9GHz/2.6GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 45W), AMD* Llano* A8-3500M (4T4C, 1.5GHz/2.4GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 35W)，AMD* Llano* A4-3300M (2T2C, 1.9GHz/2.5GHz, 2x1M L2, 48US, 35W), on Platform: HP* dv6z Motherboard 358E, Wireless: On and connected, Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Graphics: AMD* Radeon* HD 6600M (driver v. 8.834.0.0), Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3-1333, HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2, OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 64-bit, LCD: 15.6” LED resolution 1366x768
影片轉檔測試
我們來看看在影片轉檔上，第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器與競爭對手的APU筆記型處理器的表現如何呢？測試結果顯示，競爭對手最高階的APU筆記型處理器AMD A8-3530MX，需要26分鐘將2小時的影片轉檔完成。而搭載了Intel® 高速影像同步轉檔技術的Intel® Core™ i5-2410M，僅需要短短的6分鐘就能將2小時的影片轉檔完成。由此可見，AMD A8-3530MX縱使擁有四核心，也有不錯的內顯效能表現，但在轉檔方面因為沒有先進的技術加持，因此其轉檔效能並不如雙核心的Intel® Core™ i5-2410M。第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器皆內建Intel® HD Graphics 3000，並搭載Intel® 高速影像同步轉檔技術，能讓影片轉檔工作瞬間完成！
Legal Disclaimer:
Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. Go to: http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
All products, computer systems, dates, and figures specified are preliminary based on current expectations, and are subject to change without notice.
Intel product plans in this presentation do not constitute Intel plan of record product roadmaps. Please contact your Intel representative to obtain Intel’s current plan of record product roadmaps.
Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Core, Core, Core Inside, vPro, Pentium, Insider, and InTru are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries.
* Other name and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Copyright © 2011, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Source: Intel Corporation.
Configuration:
This is a First Looks analysis of first available notebooks with AMD Llano processors.
Performance and expectations could change with future steppings, drivers, or notebooks. As possible, comparisons made with similar configuration between AMD and Intel, typically using HP dv6 chasis.
AMD* Llano SKUs
A8-3530MX (4T4C, 1.9GHz/2.6GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 45W), A8-3510MX (4T4C, 1.8GHz/2.5GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 45W), A8-3500M (4T4C, 1.5GHz/2.4GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 35W)
A6- 3410MX (4T4C, 1.6GHz/2.3GHz, 4x1M L2, 64US, 45W), A6-3400M (4T4C, 1.4GHz/2.3GHz, 4x1M L2, 64US, 35W)
A4-3310MX (2T2C, 2.1GHz/2.5GHz, 2x1M L2, 48US, 45W), A4-3300M (2T2C, 1.9GHz/2.5GHz, 2x1M L2, 48US, 35W)
E2-3000M (2T2C, 1.8GHz/2.4GHz, 2x1M, 32US 35W)
On Platforms:
HP* G4/G6/G7, HP* dv6z, HP Probook 4535s, HP ProBook 6465b, 6565b, Lenovo* Z575, Toshiba* L745D, L755D, 775D, Gateway* NV55S05u
on Platform : HP* dv6z Motherboard 358E BIOS Load Optimal Default HP* ver. F.1C Graphics: AMD Radeon (driver v. 8.834.0.0) Resolution 1366x768 Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3 1333 9-9-9-24 HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2 OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 6.1.7600 Build 7600 System Power Management Policy: AC/Always On LCD Size: 15.6” Screen Brightness: 60-80 nits Wireless: On and connected
Intel processors
Core i7, Core i5, Core i3, Pentium (SNB-based)
on Platform : HP* dv6t Motherboard 1658 BIOS Load Optimal Default HP* ver. F.07 (INF Intel v9.2.0.1030) Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics (driver v. 8.15.10.2361) Resolution 1366x768 Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3 1333 9-9-9-24 HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2 OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 6.1.7600 Build 7600 System Power Management Policy: AC/Always On LCD Size: 15.6” Screen Brightness: 60-80 nits Wireless: On and connected
高電池續航力為選購筆記型電腦的重要考慮因素
電池續航力也是消費者選購筆記型電腦的重要考慮因素之一。電池續航力越長，代表使用者得以在不接電源的情況下使用筆記型電腦的時間也越長，使得筆記型電腦更具行動力。以下我們就來看看雙核心的Intel® Core™ i3-2310M及競爭對手的四核心APU 筆記型處理器 A6-3400M的續航力各是多少？我們以Mobile Mark 2007 來測試筆記型處理器的生產力效能及電池續航力。結果顯示，不管在效能或是電池續航力上，Intel® Core™ i3-2310M皆在A6-3400M之上。使用Intel® Core™ i3-2310M，將擁有6小時45分鐘的電池續航力，但使用A6-3400M，只有5小時42分鐘的電池續航力，足足少了1小時！
Legal Disclaimer:
Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. Go to: http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
All products, computer systems, dates, and figures specified are preliminary based on current expectations, and are subject to change without notice.
Intel product plans in this presentation do not constitute Intel plan of record product roadmaps. Please contact your Intel representative to obtain Intel’s current plan of record product roadmaps.
Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Core, Core, Core Inside, vPro, Pentium, Insider, and InTru are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries.
* Other name and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Copyright © 2011, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Source: Intel Corporation.
Configuration:
This is a First Looks analysis of first available notebooks with AMD Llano processors.
Performance and expectations could change with future steppings, drivers, or notebooks. As possible, comparisons made with similar configuration between AMD and Intel, typically using HP dv6 chasis.
AMD* Llano SKUs
A8-3530MX (4T4C, 1.9GHz/2.6GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 45W), A8-3510MX (4T4C, 1.8GHz/2.5GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 45W), A8-3500M (4T4C, 1.5GHz/2.4GHz, 4x1M L2, 80US, 35W)
A6- 3410MX (4T4C, 1.6GHz/2.3GHz, 4x1M L2, 64US, 45W), A6-3400M (4T4C, 1.4GHz/2.3GHz, 4x1M L2, 64US, 35W)
A4-3310MX (2T2C, 2.1GHz/2.5GHz, 2x1M L2, 48US, 45W), A4-3300M (2T2C, 1.9GHz/2.5GHz, 2x1M L2, 48US, 35W)
E2-3000M (2T2C, 1.8GHz/2.4GHz, 2x1M, 32US 35W)
On Platforms:
HP* G4/G6/G7, HP* dv6z, HP Probook 4535s, HP ProBook 6465b, 6565b, Lenovo* Z575, Toshiba* L745D, L755D, 775D, Gateway* NV55S05u
on Platform : HP* dv6z Motherboard 358E BIOS Load Optimal Default HP* ver. F.1C Graphics: AMD Radeon (driver v. 8.834.0.0) Resolution 1366x768 Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3 1333 9-9-9-24 HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2 OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 6.1.7600 Build 7600 System Power Management Policy: AC/Always On LCD Size: 15.6” Screen Brightness: 60-80 nits Wireless: On and connected
Intel processors
Core i7, Core i5, Core i3, Pentium (SNB-based)
on Platform : HP* dv6t Motherboard 1658 BIOS Load Optimal Default HP* ver. F.07 (INF Intel v9.2.0.1030) Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics (driver v. 8.15.10.2361) Resolution 1366x768 Memory: 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel DS Micron* DDR3 1333 9-9-9-24 HDD: Hitachi* Travelstar* 320GB 7200 rpm SATA2 OS: Windows* 7 Ultimate 6.1.7600 Build 7600 System Power Management Policy: AC/Always On LCD Size: 15.6” Screen Brightness: 60-80 nits Wireless: On and connected
總結
經過測試後，很清楚的看到Intel® 筆記型處理器與競爭對手的筆記型處理器的效能差距。不管是在生產力、日常應用、多媒體應用上，Intel® 筆記型處理器都表現得比競爭對手優秀。第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器不僅效能強大，更搭載了內建視覺強化功能，可讓使用者享有驚豔的視覺享受。其中包含了Intel® 無線顯示技術，這項技術能利用無線網路傳送影像到螢幕上，即可讓影音體驗不再被空間和線材所拘束。在續航力方面，第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器讓使用者擁有更長的電腦使用時間，不用再擔心筆記型電腦的電力一下子就耗盡。若為影音使用者，那麼選用第2代Intel® Core™ 處理器更是適合不過了，因為第2代Intel® Core™ 處理器搭載了Intel® 高速影像同步轉檔技術，可讓原本耗時的影音轉檔工作瞬間完成。總而言之，第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器獨有的特性，能讓使用者工作更有效率，減少等待時間，更豐富使用者的生活！因此，在選購筆記型電腦時，選用第2代Intel® Core™ 筆記型處理器將是最佳的選擇！
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
